Yes, they are. Vortex, Swarovski, Zeiss etc. We hope this gives you some additional information to help you make your decision. The Pentax are great too. I still use the off hand glassing method for those quick checks frequently throughout the day. As far as the weight, the Leica Noctivid is heavier, as it weighs 860 g, and the Zeiss Victory SF binoculars are more lightweight, at 780 g. The latter is also taller - 173 mm, while the Leica Noctivid 10x42 is 150 mm tall. The Zeiss Victory SF binoculars give you an amazing 18 mm of eye relief and a fairly typical 4 stops of adjustment. They are all incredible, and as we mentioned earlier, we are splitting hairs here for this review. I wasnt a huge fan of the readout on the diopter of the Noctivid as it didnt identify which was was plus and minus for those that need to make an adjustment. I will say though, that the incredible field of view and nearly perfect edge to edge clarity that the NL Pures give you is something you wouldnt regret having. Not a big deal, but hey, we are being nit-picky here, right? Thats pretty incredible given that the field of view on the Victory SF is significantly larger than the Noctivid. It seems like everyone's glass is judged/compared to Swarovski glass. About the Product. How do you feel about your NL 8x42 a year or two down the line? The Leica Noctivid give you an unheard of 19 mm of eye relief, and the Leica Noctivid eye cups are, by a long shot, the least likely to move on you. The neck strap includes wide webbing that only enhances comfort. Zeiss Victory SF 8x32 binoculars are fairly small at just 5.9 inches (15 cm) long with the eyecups folded down, and just over 6.25 inches (16.1 cm) long with eyecups extended. I'd try and go to Cabela's, Bass Pro Shop, Gander Mountain, a local gun shop or photo shop that has some of these and try them out inside the store and if they will let you take them outside will be the best test for your eyes. The shed hunt went live May 1st. by Michael and Diane Porter (2022) Filling a gap in the world of high-end binoculars A birder was telling us about her old binoculars the other day. I continued using the Victory SF 32 throughout the summer, right up into mid-August when I needed to get this review published. Technical Specifications Prism Type Schmidt-Pechan Roof Roof Performance Magnification 8x 8x 8x Objective Lens Diameter 32 mm 32 mm 32 mm Angle of View 67 (Apparent) 8.5 (Actual) Both are filled with nitrogen and are fullymulticoated,which makes them fogproof and waterproof. I would just like to know if anyone has had any experience and opinionsof these two high end binoculars and even the Pentax DCF ED. We finished the shed hunt with more time on the glass and I had to keep reminding myself these are a compact binocular. Sel. Hey there Ben! I simply cant believe these designs dont have standard threads for a bino adapter, particularly when nearly every pair of binoculars out there all the way up to this point does. You must have JavaScript enabled in your browser to utilize the functionality of this website. But with that gripe about these three aside, I was able to dig up a couple of outstanding options for each of these three best binoculars on the market. I have also owned Swarovski El 10x42 and 10x42 NLs. If you can afford them, they are the best binos you can buy! I thought it would be quite interesting to put the Zeiss Victory SF 10x42, Swarovski NL Pure 12x42, and Swarovski SLC 15x56 against each other in a head-to-h. However, the 12x42 NL Pures have changed the landscape forever. We were amazed to find that the 12x42 provided a nice, steady view. (I think I just said the Swaro ELs are a good budget choice? This one was a no brainier win for the Swarovski NL Pure. All other performance factors like precise focusing (including a user-friendly over-sized center focusing knob), ergonomics, edge-to-edge clarity and eye relief (ER) performed at a very high level. However, it would be a stretch to say the 10x showed me more objects than the 8xthey just showed me the objects better. Our mainly focus are ready to wear cloths , shoes, bags wallet of Italian brand like Gucci Armani Versace moncler.etc Which outlet have more choice / better selection for Europe. Thanks for taking the time to read and leave feedback. The Swarovski eyecups only have two positions of adjustment. The field of view is even wider than the comparably sized Zeiss Victory SF binoculars. If youre on a hike or you want to react quickly, you handhold your binos. . You can't go wrong with either of your two choices and I was just throwing out my experience with these optics. I have owned Gen 1 and 2 SF in 10x42 and 8x32 SFs. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website. Swaro is great too - but costs more (for you, given the prices you quoted.) This test was another one that was difficult to call until it got REALLY, REALLY dark, WAY past shooting hours before we could pick a winner. The Prada store at the mall is also much larger, good finds always at . I could save nearly a third of the weight! You cant ask for any better in an optic. For the price of the Zeiss Victory FL you quoted, I choose the Zeiss. 800-779-7256 Mrs bkdc prefers the Zeiss because it feels lighter. That is from an optical standpoint. . My buddy has the ziess victorys and they are very nice but in my opinion are not as good as swarovskis, Could you inform me please what is the difference between. Durston X-Mid Pro 2P Review | Stupid Light But Storm-Worthy? I've owned 3 different Swarovski binoculars, I'm on my second Leica, and now hunt with a Zeiss Victory. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. Email: dporter@lisco.com I like the Zeiss FLs as well and they are very good binoculars but they cost more $$ then the Swarovski SLCs. Both powers were resolving fine detail in full light and fading light conditions neck-n-neck with bigger binoculars Ive tested over the years, including my Swarovski 842 EL TAs. Springbar Tent Review | Springbar Classic Jack 140 | Challenge Old Man Winter, Forloh Youth Hunting Clothes Review | Best Youth Hunting Clothes? That optical re-think has a knock-on effect on the appearance and handling too. 8x32, 10x32, 8x42, 10x42, 12x42. Both have their strengths but I exclusively hand hold my binos and I dont glass anything over 700 yards so Im leaning towards 8x for extra exit pupil and steadiness. There is no difference when it comes to eye relief, as both stand at 18 mm. Image Color Contrast Winner: Leica Noctivid, Image Resolution Winner: Swarovski NL Pure, Overall Most Pleasant Image Winner: Zeiss Victory SF. Eye Pieces: Swarovski NL Pure vs Zeiss Victory SF vs Leica Noctivid, Focus Mechanisms: Swarovski NL Pure vs Leica Noctivid vs Zeiss Victory SF, Diopters: Swarovski NL Pure vs Leica Noctivid vs Zeiss Victory SF, In Hand Feel: Swarovski NL Pure vs Leica Noctivid vs Zeiss Victory SF, Edge-to-Edge Clarity: Swarovski NL Pure vs Zeiss Victory SF vs Leica Noctivid, Low Light Performance: Swarovski NL Pure vs Zeiss Victory SF vs Leica Noctivid, Field of View: Swarovski NL Pure vs Zeiss Victory SF vs Leica Noctivid. Its the best option Ive found when you dont have a standard thread for a stud. Im sure many will disagree, but I handed these three binoculars to others in our test group without saying anything, and they all confirmed what I thought. Best regards, good hunting and happy holidays! You might as well throw in brightness too. I dont have anything close to an opportunity to try any of these side by side so buying based on reading is a tough chore. The FL's use of Abbe-Koenig prisms makes them inherently brighter than the Schmidt Pechan prisms found in the EL. Me thinks that they have used the exact same optics as in the previous models Put it this way: you know when theyre around your neck. Apparently they can be avoided by more careful eye placement if one cares to take the trouble. Conquest is good but its not their premium brand. Swarovski NL Pure has a close focus of 2 m, in contrast to Zeiss' 1.5 m of close focus. From day one I installed the adapter lugs for standard straps and now find the ability to rotate the lugs actually has a little advantage when a harness strap becomes twisted. Looking for a review of bino/rangefinder cambo. All Rights Reserved, The Best of Hunting Big Mule Deer Trailer, Id Rather Be Lucky Than Good a Rokslide.com Original Film, Swarovski ATC Compact Spotting Scope Review, Vortex Razor HD 4000 GB Rangefinder Review, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TfN4eHAGDo&t=140s, Zeiss Victory Harpia 85 Spotting Scope Review. Although it is not an exact comparison due to the magnification difference, my observations are as follows: Cant speak to the NLs but I have zero complaints from my 8x42 SFs. Re: serravalle designer outlet Vs The mall. Heck, even if you do, you just might find that you like this style better! But I'm just curious as August is coming up, these 2 binos will be released around this time, what are you guys getting? Let me know which route you end up going! In my experience the FL excels in centerfield sharpness and clarity. They are all equally sharp to my eyes, but the Geovid suffers from significant distortion compared to the other two that have flat and clear images to nearly the field stop. Neither in Germany, where I live, nor in the Scandinavia or the European Alps where I travel a lot. Many thanks, Lee, also from my side, for your nice and interesting comparison! If youve saved enough money to drop on one of these three, you have likely done your research. It's a surprisingly simple gadget, the Forehead Rest. While I'm sure the NL is a top binocular, please be aware that it is just out and there are far too many pronouncements about its excellence far too early in any evaluation process. In terms of optical performance, Swarovski is superior, hence more expensive. With their alpha viewing experience, lightweight, and good ergonomics, they provide a binocular-only hunter everything he needs with almost no downside. I much prefer the NL from ergonomics to glass. Your mileage may vary of course and I have no clue of the specific needs of hunters. Swarovski VS Zeiss Body Comparison As far as the weight, Swarowski NL is heavier, as it weighs 850 g, and Zeiss Victory is more lightweight, at 780 g. The height and width do not differ much, even though Zeiss wins more points in this field. When it comes to sports optics, Zeiss offers high-end optics, which makes them the world leader in that field. As an Amazon Associate Backwoods Pursuit earns from qualifying purchases. Arne. I both forgot about the vastness of the land and how much hunting styles differ between Central Europe and the US. What is different is that in this binocular, the narrowing is along the diagonal. Does Swarovski really have better optics than the Zeiss Victory line? I bet in Germany you would hear comparisons to Zeiss far more often than comparisons to Swarovski. That being said, the Geovid is still outstanding glass with a very sharp image and great color and contrast. And depending upon how your eyes work with the NL and SF, you may find the SF a better performer. The group noticed that the Leica Noctivids were the smoothest of the bunch, but had a small amount of play right at the beginning before it engaged, which was very disappointing. Swarovski NL Pure has a close focus of 2 m, in contrast to Zeiss' 1.5 m of close focus. The usual difference that one would expect as the magnification increases: I had the 8x42 and the 10x42 and the latter was worse---the larger EP of the 8x42 makes eye placement easier. Enter your email address to subscribe to our blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. My son, Cash, and I packed in on horses three miles. You are using an out of date browser. The size and weight of binoculars is important if you are going deep into the backcountry and trying to keep the weight down. Love optics? But how do you know which one is going to fit your specific needs? Yeah, buying from reading a review can be tough for sure as everyones eyes may prefer something different. Are these three binos really worth the premium they fetch above that? You cant go wrong with any of them, but since we were able to do such an in-depth comparison, we picked them apart with a fine tooth comb to bring you an authentic review in order to see the differences between them so you can better decide which pair would be best for your specific needs. the widest field of view on binoculars ever, Swarovski NL Pure 8x42 WB VS Leica Noctivid 8x42, Swarovski NL Pure 8x42 WB VS Swarovski EL 8.5x42, Swarovski NL Pure 8x42 WB VS Nikon EDG 8x42 DCF, Swarovski EL 8.5x42 VS Vortex Razor UHD 8x42, Swarovski EL 8.5x42 WB VS Zeiss Victory SF 8x42, Swarovski EL 8.5x42 VS Leica Ultravid HD+ 8x42, Swarovski EL 8.5x42 VS Leica Noctivid 8x42, Swarovski EL 8.5x42 VS Nikon EDG 8x42 DCF, Leica Noctivid 8x42 VS Zeiss Victory SF 8x42, Leica Noctivid 8x42 VS Blaser Primus 8x42, Leica Noctivid 8x42 VS Nikon EDG DCF 8x42, Leica Ultravid HD+ 8x42 VS Blaser Primus 8x42, Leica Ultravid HD+ 8x42 VS Nikon EDG DCF 8x42, Leica Ultravid HD+ 8x42 VS Vortex Razor UHD 8x42, Leica Ultravid HD+ 8x50 VS Blaser Primus 8x42, Leica Ultravid HD+ 8x42 VS Zeiss Victory SF 8x42, Swarovski NL Pure 8x42 WB VS Zeiss Victory FS 8x42 - Swarovski Binoculars VS Zeiss Binoculars, Introduction to Swarovski NL Pure 8x42 WB VS Zeiss Victory SF 8x42, Swarovski NL Pure WB VS Zeiss Victory SF Comparison Table, Central focusing, Fogproof, Fully multicoated, Waterproof, Fogproof, Fully multicoated, Rubberized body, Shockproof, Waterproof, The difference in price is 300. I think its generally agreed that the NL is superior optically. They certainly dont give the compact viewing experience. I own both pairs. 150 helpful votes. Victory FL is great, you will be happy. The comprehensive database of binoculars with their parameters and users opinions. Here are the differences observed after a first comparison that lasted about 1 hour: Optical differences The resolution on the center was higher at SF. Thanks for taking the time to comment. In fact, Id venture to say the ER, especially in the 8x (specd at 19mm), was the best Ive tried with eye glasses (to note, Ive never tried eye glasses with the Swarovski NL Pure). If you have an Outdoorsmans Adapter, they also make an Outdoorsmans Stud for Swarovski NL Pure that works with their adapter. for Keyboard Navigation; Press?? Yes, they are more compact than the Zeiss Victory SF, but with that, I felt like they werent quite as comfortable. You can call us for advice or to chat about choosing optics or other birding products. Here are the specs of these 3 best binoculars: Tripod Adaptability: Swarovski NL Pure vs Zeiss Victory SF vs Leica Noctivid Let's face it. With both the Swarovski EL 842 and 1042 binoculars weighing 835g and 840g respectively, It is obvious that the Swarovski EL binoculars are about 100g heavier than the Zeiss Victory SF binoculars. Easy to handhold and when mounted on a tripod are downright incredible. lighter and are a little longer, and the eyecups have 4 positions of adjustment. The 10x are in no way tunnel vision but when you consider that youre looking at 16% less (465 vs. 390) of the hillside, you can see my point. Ofcourse, the EL definitely beats the FL in terms of edge sharpness plus the ELs feel a bit more comfortable ergonomically and their customer service is superb. Plus I know for a fact that Swarovski has the best customer service in the business and they have pretty quick turn around if you need them serviced. Press?? Objective Lens Diameter. Crescent torches? I just started getting into birding. #1 I had the opportunity to compare Zeiss SF 10x42 (new black version) vs Swaovski EL Swarovision 10x42 (current version). for Accessibility menu; B2B, Gov, Students & More. They are extremely comfortable, and probably the smoothest of the group by just a hair over the Swarovski NL Pure. 2197 236th Blvd. The difference might or might not seem huge, and you might or might not like the NL better. No items to compare. If youd like an in-depth review on all the performance parameters of the Zeiss Victory SF 832, be sure and check out Roger Vines Scope Views review here, When shopping for optics, please consider Rokslide Sponsors Cameraland & Outdoorsmans, Robby Denning started hunting mule deer in the late 1970s, only missing one season in 35 years. Regarding the weight, Swarowski NL weighs more, that is 840 g, and Zeiss Victory weighs less, that is 780 g. The height and width do not differ much, even though Zeiss is a bit shorter: it is 53 mm tall, while Swarovski stands at 71 mm. Everyones running 10x but Im still 8x (I ran 7x for over a decade). Tipsy Tuesday: Big Bucks on Heavily pressured public land, Latest draw news, Gear reviews, Western hunting news, Wyoming Hunting! The view is transcendently transparent. The differences were nearly impossible to pull out, but they were there when you put them side by side and spent some time behind all of them looking at the same object in the distance. Who's glass do you like better and why? The distance is easily adjustable to fit your face. I cant say 1 is better than the other. Thats far more than any other pair of binoculars Ive tested. Zeiss knocked it out of the park here. Hello! the widest field of view on binoculars ever, Swarovski NL Pure 10x42 WB VS Leica Noctivid 10x42, Swarovski NL Pure 10x42 WB VS Nikon EDG 10x42 DCF, Swarovski NL Pure 10x42 WB VS Swarovski EL 10x42, Swarovski EL 10x42 VS Zeiss Victory SF 10x42, Swarovski EL 10x42 VS Leica Ultravid HD+ 10x42, Swarovski EL 10x42 VS Leica Noctivid 10x42, Swarovski EL 10x42 VS Nikon EDG 10x42 DCF, Swarovski EL 10x42 VS Vortex Razor UHD 10x42, Leica Noctivid 10x42 VS Nikon EDG DCF 10x42, Leica Noctivid 10x42 VS Blaser Primus 10x42, Leica Noctivid 10x42 VS Zeiss Victory SF 10x42, Leica Ultravid HD+ 10x42 VS Zeiss Victory SF 10x42, Leica Ultravid HD+ 10x42 VS Blaser Primus 10x42, Leica Ultravid HD+ 10x42 VS Nikon EDG DCF 10x42, Leica Ultravid 10x50 VS Blaser Primus 10x42, Leica Ultravid HD+ 10x42 VS Vortex Razor UHD 10x42, Swarovski NL Pure 10x42 WB VS Zeiss Victory FS 10x42 - Swarovski Binoculars VS Zeiss Binoculars, Introduction to Swarovski NL Pure 10x42 WB VS Zeiss Victory SF 10x42, With this in mind, this is where the question of comparison between the, The latter is the successor of a series known as, Swarovski NL Pure WB VS Zeiss Victory FS Comparison Table, Central focusing, Fogproof, Fully multicoated, Waterproof, Fast focus, Fogproof, Fully multicoated, Rubberized body, Shockproof, Waterproof, This particular model is 300 more expensive than, The height and width do not differ much, even though, Supporters of the newer the better might favor the, There is no difference when it comes to eye relief, as both stand at, Both brands are good, and it all depends on the buyers' opinion, and what people expect from, Clip-On Adapters for Pulsar Krypton (M35x1.0), Clip-On Adapters for Meopta Meonight 1.1 (M46x0.75), Clip-On Adapters for Swarovski TM35 (M44x0.75), Clip-On Adapters for Night Pearl (M43x0.75), Clip-On Adapters for Infiray CTP13 (M30x1.0). For me personally, binoculars are all about portability and especially speed of use. Of the two 10x32's, I had a little less glare in the NL 10x32 than I did the SF 10x32. But Swarovski also provides an optional accessory that dramatically improves the stability of the view. Swarovski NL Pure 10x42 WB and. In this video we are looking at three of the best binoculars for hunting: the Swarovski NL Pure vs Zeiss Victory SF vs Leica Noctivid. 182. JavaScript seems to be disabled in your browser. Either way you are going to get an excellent binocular. Ill have to admit, I was REALLY bummed when I found out the NL Pure did not feature a locking diopter. Ive used a full-sized binocular with an objective lens in the 40-50mm range for over 25 years. UK. Nothing all that unique or amazing, just a really nice feeling pair of binos. Privacy Policy | Content Disclaimer | Cookie Policy | Terms & Conditions. Copyright Rokslide.com 2021. I checked out the 10x42 NL, EL, and EL TA the other night at Scheels and besides the TA being a little subpar, I had a hard time telling the difference between the NL and EL. SF 8x32 v NL Pure 8x42 starforgedape Jul 30, 2020 1 2 3 . Essential or Dumb? Small, but its there. . Stay tuned and hopefully soon we can put that together. As far as image contrast goes, the group gave the ever so slight edge to the NL Pure, with the Victory SF right on its tail. The material they are made of is thin rubber in combination with plastic threads, which . (We are talking by a hair.) The two binoculars that I am interested in are the 10x42 Victory Victory FL T* and the 10x42 Swarovski WB. ColleaguesCould you inform me please what is the difference between Swarovski SLC HD 10x42and Swarovski SLC WB 10x42? What was done better and what was done worse? The ELs were the standard for a long time, so I have no doubt that they would be more than good enough and the law of diminishing returns really starts taking affect. It may not display this or other websites correctly. I've owned 3 different Swarovski binoculars, I'm on my second Leica, and now hunt with a Zeiss Victory. Zeiss Victory SF 8x42 both have a central diopter setting position, and the focusing system as well. Free shipping for many products! I'd not advise you to do it, unless there is something compelling about some dislike for the Zeiss you can't live with. Robby has scouted and hunted literally thousands of square miles of mule deer country and brings a wealth of knowledge about these experiences with him. Enter? I'm looking at the Zeiss Victory SF or Swaro NL Pure in 10x42. How much better is the NL really? Back to Product List . Its crazy to find yourself complaining about the focus mechanisms on $3000 binos, but hey, we did this review to really scrutinize them to see their differences. Swarovski NL Pure 8x42 WB and. I have not owned either glass in 10x but I have owned three configurations of the FL and two versions of the EL. The Zeiss Victory SFs were around my neck for most of those miles and when they werent, they were packed in my saddlebags or Stone Glacier EVO 3300 in their padded carrying case. I was pleased, very pleased, at the wide FOV in the Victory SF 32s. This now makes perfect sense. Every binoculars fit's different people's eye sockets different, and all of our eyes are different with different rods and cones. For most of us hunters here (especially in the western US), weve found incredible benefit from putting them on a tripod, then utilizing a spotting scope to determine if its an animal that we want to pursue. Our group also noticed just how amazingly balanced the Victory SF binos felt in hand. Sincerely from Russia from a bird lover. All three of these were in the 1042 variety to keep things fair across the board. As you can see in the photo above, the Leica Noctivid is the smallest and most compact of the group. We'll compare these three and go over how they are different, how they each excelled, and where we thought each of them could be better. Exped Ultra 3R, 5R, 7R Review | Best Exped Sleeping Pad EVER?!?! Even after a year, I have to correct the position of the eyecups on my NL multiple times per day due to the exceedingly tight fitting rainguard pulling/twisting/pushing them out of position. But I would have liked to see a section scoring glare-flare control / internal reflections / blackouts, as this is another very important aspect of an optics uncovered in this review and, apparently according to what Ive read, the Noctivids are the winners here in this regard hands down, and the NL Pures the worst. We certainly do here at Backwoods Pursuit, so make sure to check out our MONSTER 26 BINOCULAR REVIEW, as well as our massive 19 SPOTTING SCOPE REVIEW. I cant say for sure that I know if the glass is the same between those two as we didnt have the ELs in our big bino review to compare. All of them give you incredible low light performance and will keep you out glassing way past legal shooting light if you want to be. Sort: Order Added Price: lowest first Price: highest first Brand: A - Z Brand: Z - A Top Rated Clear All Its hands down my favorite focus mechanism of the group. I had the SF and compared to my buddy EL we both preferred the SF. Are the NLs better? Put any of these in my hands and Id be a happy camper! Zeiss Victory SF 10x42 both have a central diopter setting position, as well as the focusing system. Not only balanced, but the position of the focus wheel is absolutely perfect. The optics war is more fierce than ever, and before the next-gen binoculars hit the market, let us put these two contenders to the test. Oddly though, it is the heaviest weighing in at 30.4 oz. They also have the thickest rubber as you can see if the picture above, so if that is a style that you typically like, youll love the Zeiss Victory SF eye cups. Commentdocument.getElementById("comment").setAttribute( "id", "a372efd69b67075c7a5aa886d0b2d359" );document.getElementById("b4a0867071").setAttribute( "id", "comment" ); Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Putting them side by side is essential in order to really pinpoint the differences between them to help you answer those questions. The Leica Noctivid had some noticeable loss of edge-to-edge clarity on the outer 10% of the image (still very, very good) while the Zeiss Victory SF only seemed to suffer loss of clarity on the outermost 5% of the image. I had the chance to peep through either one of it in the last few months and although unfortunately I did not spend nearly as much time with it as you did or had a side-by-side comparison, your results reflect my initial impressions. I'd say ignore the hype until you can find one at a dealer someplace. So glad it was helpful in making your decision! While both the Zeiss Victory SF and the Leica Noctivid have a locking diopter, the Swarovski NL Pure does not. So there you have it! Enter? And yes, the rainguard fits far too tightly. It was synonomys with elite birding. Putting what most would consider to be the three best binoculars in the world side by side for testing is something not a lot of folks get the opportunity to do, but amazingly thats exactly what we did here at Backwoods Pursuit, and we wanted to share with you some of the data we collected. Tripod Adaptability Winner: Swarovski NL Pure. The difference in field of view, edge-to-edge clarity, and low light performance were enough to make the difference. 42 mm. 3. But really.. she prefers 8x32s. It's a startlingly pleasant sensation. Swarovski EL 10x50 Swarovision - binoculars review - AllBinos.com. Zeiss, a Rokslide sponsor, offered a loaner pair (two actually-read on) of their new Victory SF 32 binoculars for testing and review. I got bad glare in the Swarovski NL 8x42 but practically no glare in the NL 10x32 so that shoots Henry's theory about smaller exit pupil binoculars having more glare all to heck. The Zeiss Victory SF is by far the largest of the group, but Zeiss somehow got the incredible performance that the Victory gives you in a 27.8 oz package, even though its larger than the others. Cant go wrong with either. Swarovski Optik, with its offices in Austria, have been astonishing us with amazing products since the beginning. You might be thinking, These are all binoculars in the 3k price range. In order to do this we tested them side by side on a tripod for hours in many different lighting conditions as well as various viewing conditions- everything from full sunlight to nearly pitch dark and everything in between. But it is more prone to glare. When I sit down and compair them I come to the conclusion that you are buying a name (also great warranties). Swarovski Forehead Rest for NL Pure Binoculars | eBay. The NL Pure also had the most grainy feel of the bunch which was a little disappointing for the most expensive binocular of the group. He began hunting the West on a DIY budget hunting an average of 30 days a year for mule deer. All of this testing is covered in the sub-five minute video below. Sothe SFs have a unique style and feel and view. I also have a Leica Geovid 3000. The Zeiss Victory SF was just a hair behind the Leica Noctivid as far as a grainy feel, but has absolutely ZERO play, the perfect resistance that was consistent throughout one end of the focus range to the other, and is perfectly positioned for your hand. It's stunning from the moment you meet it. We'll compare these . Press the rest against your forehead to stabilize the view. Seriously try a pair of 10X42 Meopta Meostar before you spend the money on one of those two. When you say that "Leica has better overall control of flare in certain lighting conditions than Zeiss", can you explain what you are talking about by flare? The diopter lens covers are, well, lets just say they work as well as most covers. | 3 Essential Pieces, Tract Toric 2.5-1544 Review | Tract Optics Ultra HD Powerful Hunting Scope. Hello! These three incredible binoculars change the meaning of low light. When all others had long since faded away, these three were still going strong. Any way you go you'll be happy with what you have. Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen. Zeiss Victory SF, however, is produced in Germany and is one of the oldest optics manufacturers in the world. The Pures are noted for their massive FOV. Other than that, I cant find a bad thing to say. I also documented the improved Depth-of-Field (DOF) the 8x provided over the 10x. Robby believes all of creation is from God for man to manage, respect, and through which to know its Creator. In this video we are looking at three of the best binoculars for hunting: the Swarovski NL Pure vs Zeiss Victory SF vs Leica Noctivid. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Interesting articles and comparisons. As for the adapters: This seems a very American thing to me. Serravalle is much bigger and with the recent renovations has more luxury shops.BUT I've always found more things that I like at the mall, and more recent items as well.